If you thought the story of January 6, 2021 had already been told, neatly wrapped, labeled “insurrection,” and filed away in the archives of American hysteria, think again. A new report highlighted by ZeroHedge and originally sourced from PJ Media suggests that the official narrative may be wobbling like a fencepost in Wyoming wind.
A 94% Match the FBI Missed
According to the report, independent investigators used gait-recognition technology (yes, the same tech used to identify people by the way they walk) to analyze surveillance footage of the mysterious “pipe-bomb suspect” seen planting devices near the DNC and RNC headquarters on January 5th, 2021.
The result? A 94% match to a former Capitol Police officer named Shauni Kerkhoff, someone who, conveniently, was never a suspect and never mentioned publicly.
For years, the FBI has claimed to be “stumped” by the bomber’s identity. They had footage, timestamps, and a timeline tighter than Jackson’s parking during Old West Days, yet somehow, nothing. Independent analysts, however, appear to have cracked the case in their spare time, armed with open-source tools and a healthy distrust of government press releases.
The “Fedsurrection” Theory Gains Traction
Writers at ZeroHedge, The Blaze, and several online investigators are now openly floating what they call a “Fedsurrection” — the theory that elements within federal law enforcement or intelligence may have helped orchestrate, instigate, or at least infiltrate the events of January 6th.
That’s a heavy accusation, but as ZeroHedge notes, the pieces are starting to fit a little too neatly:
- Unreleased surveillance footage that took years to see daylight.
- Uncharged “instigators” seen on video urging crowds forward.
- Media corrections from outlets like the BBC, which recently admitted to “editing errors” in its coverage of Trump’s rally speech.
It’s all enough to make even the most patient observer mutter, “Huh… that’s odd.”
Meanwhile, the Media’s Still Out to Lunch
You’d think such revelations might earn a segment on CNN, a buried paragraph in The Washington Post, or at least a snarky tweet from a blue-check journalist. Nope. Silence.
Apparently, there’s just no airtime left between climate-panic panels and live coverage of celebrity endorsements.
Outlets that once spent years dissecting the movements of a man in face paint and horns can’t seem to muster a headline when credible forensic tech points to potential insider involvement. Maybe they’re just waiting for the government to confirm it, you know, the same government accused of being involved.
What It Means Going Forward
If these claims hold up, it could redefine how the public remembers January 6th, not as a spontaneous riot of citizens gone wild, but as a managed event with layers of infiltration and manipulation.
It wouldn’t be the first time the feds have “over-participated” in their own sting operations. From COINTELPRO to the Whitmer kidnapping plot, history is littered with moments when the line between enforcement and entrapment got blurrier than a snowstorm over Teton Pass.
Whether the Kerkhoff theory proves true or not, the fact that independent researchers are the ones uncovering it, while billion-dollar media outlets pretend not to notice, tells you everything you need to know about modern journalism.
Editor’s Note
The claims in the ZeroHedge and PJ Media reports remain unverified by federal authorities, but whistleblowers continue to emerge. The FBI has not commented on the identity of the suspect or the allegations of insider involvement. As always, readers are encouraged to review multiple sources and form their own conclusions, though judging by the silence from the “mainstream,” that may take some digging.
AntlersArch founder and the voice behind Teton Tattle.
